Does Bo Know Broncos?? wrote: Time to cash out !
?????
Houston - I am EFL'ers Problem wrote:
Thanks for the clarification, I’ll make a motion at dinner to change that rule.
so if u want 4 rbs how many are u thinking on wr's and and te's?? our orignal settings gave u the option of 2 rb, 2 wr, and 1 te, or 1 rb, 3 wrs, and 1 te, or 2 rb, 1 wr and 2 te...... the intent of the flex was to add one more scoring position......4 rb's is not what the intent of adding flex was for
but of course u can bring up whatever u want the league to vote on
Houston - I am EFL'ers Problem wrote:Adding the flex meant you could have an extra rb, wr, or te.....the max rb's prior to adding the flex was two, so now it is 3 if u use a rb for your flex....since 3 wr was the prior max u can have 4 now, if u use 1 rb...
I seriously thought when we added the extra flex position we made it possible to start 4 rb’s? Seems weird we can do 1 rb but not 1 wr.