Guest of the League
Electric Football League Est. 2003
FFL: Week 7 | NFL: Week 7
1025100ALL
40-Something-9ers Sat Oct 19 4:31pm ET

Does Bo Know Broncos?? wrote: Time to cash out !

?????

Does Bo Know Broncos?? Sat Oct 19 4:12pm ET
Time to cash out !
Does Bo Know Broncos?? Sat Oct 19 4:06pm ET
Lol
Houston - I am EFL'ers Problem Sat Oct 19 12:59pm ET
Must starts:
Qb
Rb
Wr
Te
K
Def
Other 3 spots any combo of RB, WR or TE
40-Something-9ers Sat Oct 19 12:57pm ET

Houston - I am EFL'ers Problem wrote:
Thanks for the clarification, I’ll make a motion at dinner to change that rule.

so if u want 4 rbs how many are u thinking on wr's and and te's??    our orignal settings gave u the option of 2 rb, 2 wr, and 1 te, or 1 rb, 3 wrs, and 1 te, or 2 rb, 1 wr and 2 te......   the intent of the flex was to add one more scoring position......4 rb's is not what the intent of adding flex was for

but of course u can bring up whatever u want the league to vote on

Houston - I am EFL'ers Problem Sat Oct 19 12:46pm ET
Ok
All NFL fg are 3 points also
Eagleize it Sat Oct 19 12:43pm ET
You don’t see many 4 running back sets in the NFL
Houston - I am EFL'ers Problem Sat Oct 19 12:41pm ET
Thanks for the clarification, I’ll make a motion at dinner to change that rule.
Commissioner Sat Oct 19 12:29pm ET
Edited: Sat Oct 19 12:30pm ET by Commissioner

Houston - I am EFL'ers Problem wrote:
I seriously thought when we added the extra flex position we made it possible to start 4 rb’s? Seems weird we can do 1 rb but not 1 wr.
  Adding the flex meant you could have an extra rb, wr, or te.....the max rb's prior to adding the flex was two, so now it is 3 if u use a rb for your flex....since 3 wr was the prior max u can have 4 now, if u use 1 rb...

Houston - I am EFL'ers Problem Fri Oct 18 12:11pm ET
I seriously thought when we added the extra flex position we made it possible to start 4 rb’s? Seems weird we can do 1 rb but not 1 wr.