Trade Block Update

Players on the Block:

• Cade Klubnik QB NYJ
• Tyler Allgeier RB ARI
• Kaelon Black RB SF
• Jonah Coleman RB DEN
• Jaylen Wright RB MIA
• Tanner Koziol TE JAX

The arguments are much worse. Lmao

"But Crushers remains silent as his alter-ego spews nonsense."  I think you nailed it, VPN, brother CC, and boom, same guy, 2 teams. 

THIS LEAGUE IS RIGGED AF! wrote:

UGK DC1 wrote:
This is really tiresome. The guy with the highest IQ in his Mom’s basement doesn’t know the meaning of straw man argument. Shocking! Everyone is wrong, Crushers is a genius…. But Crushers remains silent as his alter-ego spews nonsense. Will it ever end?

I never said I lost the trade so yes this is a straw man. My argument was that it was even and beneficial to both of our teams and that has proven to be correct. Yes, rephrasing what I said in an incorrect manner in order to argue against it does indeed qualify as a straw man argument 

You have now covered all 3 scenarios -- (1) you first said that the League ruined your team and stole your money, which suggests that you knew that u "won" the trade, (2) you then argued that Crushers was a genius and was getting Simpson and Helm, both elite players of the future, while Murray and Jacobs and the others players u received were trash, injured and of no value, suggesting that Crushers "won" the trade, (3) if the trade was FAIR, an even trade (an apple for an apple), which is your new claim ... why would u care so much about which side of the trade you're on? If the trade was in fact FAIR, you're no worse off today. He got his apple back, and you got your apple back. So why are you still complaining?

UGK DC1 wrote:
This is really tiresome. The guy with the highest IQ in his Mom’s basement doesn’t know the meaning of straw man argument. Shocking! Everyone is wrong, Crushers is a genius…. But Crushers remains silent as his alter-ego spews nonsense. Will it ever end?

I never said I lost the trade so yes this is a straw man. My argument was that it was even and beneficial to both of our teams and that has proven to be correct. Yes, rephrasing what I said in an incorrect manner in order to argue against it does indeed qualify as a straw man argument